South Africa’s Budget Crisis: Political Deadlock and VAT Disputes Threaten Economic Stability

by Hope Ngobeni

image source

South Africa is facing a critical juncture, according to Professor Andre Thomashausen, an expert in international law from the University of South Africa, following the rescheduling of Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana’s highly anticipated Budget speech. Initially set for Wednesday, the speech has been delayed until March, raising alarms about the country’s fiscal health and the internal disagreements that led to the postponement. Thomashausen warned that if the government cannot agree on a budget, particularly due to spiraling public spending, the country could experience another 20% drop in GDP, on top of the already significant decline since 2000. He emphasized that ideological divisions within the Government of National Unity (GNU) are preventing essential concessions, deepening the crisis.


Experts suggest that the proposed 2% VAT increase might be a key point of contention, sparking the budget delay. Independent economic analyst Professor Bonke Dumisa expressed frustration over the situation, calling it embarrassing and unfortunate that a dispute over VAT led to the postponement. He highlighted the impact of a VAT hike on the country’s poorest citizens, noting that those receiving the Social Relief of Distress grant, which is only R370, would be disproportionately affected by the increase. Dumisa pointed out that the government, facing a cash shortfall, is looking to raise VAT rather than take on more debt, but doing so could hurt the most vulnerable.

Economics professor Waldo Krugell from North-West University added that the policy uncertainty within the GNU is exacerbating the situation. He noted that while everyone agrees that resources are limited, the lack of consensus on how to allocate them is creating instability. The failure to reach an agreement on the budget has the potential to escalate uncertainty surrounding the GNU’s commitment to necessary reforms, which could negatively affect the value of the Rand and deter investment in the country.

Professor Thomashausen warned that the consequences of ongoing economic mismanagement could be dire. He suggested that if South Africa’s motor manufacturing industry collapses due to the loss of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) with the U.S., coupled with irresponsible VAT hikes and unresolved municipal debts, the country could face unemployment levels as high as 60%. He stressed that such a scenario would mark the end of the South African dream, causing widespread suffering without benefiting anyone.

Political analysts Siyabonga Ntombela and Zakhele Ndlovu from the University of KwaZulu-Natal also weighed in on the situation. Ntombela suggested that party disagreements over key elements of the Finance Minister’s speech, such as tax policies or budget allocations, might be behind the delay. He pointed out that these types of disagreements are common under the GNU, as different parties seek to prioritize issues important to their constituencies. Ndlovu noted specific policy disputes, such as the Bela Bill and the Expropriation Bill, as well as concerns about the proposed VAT increase. He argued that the government’s plan to raise VAT to address its budget deficit would unfairly burden the working class, which is why members of the GNU were not in agreement.

Bennie van Zyl, the general manager of TLU SA, voiced concerns about the negative impact on businesses, especially farmers. He stressed that the uncertainty created by the delay complicates matters for farmers, who already face significant challenges. Van Zyl criticized the situation as mismanagement, which he believes undermines investor confidence. He called on the government to prioritize stability and policies that would encourage investment.

Rachel Bukasa, Executive Director of the civil society group Black Sash, also expressed her disappointment, condemning the political infighting within the GNU that led to the postponement. She emphasized that the Budget Speech is not merely a formality but a crucial lifeline for vulnerable groups, including the poor, unemployed, elderly, and children who rely on social grants. While Black Sash supports the rejection of the VAT increase, Bukasa criticized the government for waiting until the last minute to cancel the speech, leaving South Africans in limbo about how essential social programs will be funded.

The postponement of the Budget Speech has sparked intense debate, with various sectors of society expressing their concerns over the state of South Africa’s economy and the political gridlock that is hindering progress. As the country grapples with these issues, the road ahead remains uncertain, and the need for effective leadership and decisive action has never been more critical.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00